Statistics
ADU statistics
48 of 68 figures on this page are HyreADU calculations, each traced to the study that produced it. The rest are labeled as agency-published or as trade estimates. Nothing here is a national ADU statistic derived from Californian data.
Written by HyreADU Research Desk Primary-source research and data analysis
Audited by HyreADU Research Desk Provenance and figure-ledger audit
The short version
The strongest ADU statistics in the United States are Californian, because California is the only state that collects them. Jurisdictions reported 178,495 accessory-dwelling-unit building-permit units and 102,356 certificates of occupancy to the Department of Housing and Community Development for 2018–2025 — a cumulative ratio of 57.3%.
Annual permit volume went from 12,050 to 32,126 units, a 2.67-fold rise, and ADUs went from 9.1% of all housing units permitted in the state to 26.1%.
A permit is not a building. Among 81,853 matched projects the median permit-to-certificate lag is 1 year, 78.9% finish within one and 93.9% within two — and the 2018 permit cohort’s observed completion rate is still only 47.1% after seven years of follow-up.
Unmatched is not the same as unbuilt, and this page never treats it as such.
Two clocks, measured separately. In the City of Los Angeles the median from application to permit issuance is 162 days (IQR 79–301); the median from issuance to certificate of occupancy is 499 days on a censored-aware estimate, against 367 days if you look only at the permits that finished.
Add the two medians and a Los Angeles ADU is a 1.8-year undertaking from paperwork to keys — a HyreADU calculation across two studies, and an order-of-magnitude figure, not a schedule.
Size is chosen by the statute, not by the household. The median new detached ADU permitted in Los Angeles declares 920 square feet, 635 permits declare exactly 1,200 — the statutory ceiling — and 32.5% come in at or under 750 square feet, the size at or below which no impact fee may be charged.
There is no national ADU count, and this page does not manufacture one. The federal permit survey has four structure categories and accessory is not among them; an ADU made by conversion enters the national units series as zero units.
48 of 68 figures below are HyreADU calculations (48 hyreadu calculation, 16 agency published, 4 trade / survey estimate). Every one links to the study that produced it.
Read this before you quote anything here
Five constraints sit above the tables because they change what every figure on this page is allowed to mean. A statistic quoted without them is a different statistic.
- This page is California-heavy, and it is labeled that way on every row
HCD’s Annual Progress Report is a Californian instrument. The Los Angeles figures are the City of Los Angeles, a single jurisdiction of about four million people inside a state of forty.
Neither is a national ADU statistic, and neither is scaled into one anywhere on this page.
Where a national figure exists at all it is federal or from a named national study, and it is marked as such.
The how-many-ADUs study sets out why the honest national answer is an evidence ladder rather than a number.
- A permit is not a completion, and a completion ratio is not a completion rate
Dividing 102,356 certificates dated 2018–2025 by 178,495 permits dated 2018–2025 answers a production-accounting question — how many finished units were recorded in the window — not a project question.
Completions recorded in any year mostly belong to earlier permit cohorts. The cohort follow-up in the permits-vs-completions study is the right instrument for a project question, and it puts the 2018 cohort’s observed completion rate at 47.1% after seven years.
- Unmatched is not unbuilt
46,944 of 114,651 permit units from 2018–2023 (40.9%) have no matching completion row.
That set contains units still under construction, abandoned projects, finished units whose certificate was never reported, and projects whose tracking identifier changed between the permit row and the completion row.
Reporting it as an abandonment rate would be a fabrication with a real number attached to it.
- Declared permit valuation is not construction cost
The valuation figures below are what an applicant declared to a building department, usually for fee calculation. They exclude design fees, utility connections, permit fees themselves, financing, landscaping and the owner’s own labor, and jurisdictions apply different valuation tables.
A median declared valuation of $40,000 in Los Angeles is a fact about permit paperwork. It is not what an ADU costs. The permit-valuation study is explicit about the gap.
- No figure here is advice, and none of it is a forecast for your lot
A median is a description of a distribution that has already happened. Your parcel has a zone, a slope, a sewer lateral, a panel size, a fire-hazard classification and a plan checker.
HyreADU does not design, permit or build accessory dwelling units, and nothing on this page should be read as legal, tax, financial or construction advice.
Read the provenance, not just the number
Most ADU statistics circulating online are a chain of citation that terminates in a builder brochure.
A figure gets quoted by a trade blog, which is quoted by a news site, which is quoted by a marketing page, and by the fourth hop the original method — a survey of ninety owners, a single city, a year now half a decade old — has fallen off. The number survives; the thing that made it meaningful does not.
The spine of this page is therefore provenance rather than volume. Every figure in every table carries one of three labels, and the label is not decorative — it tells you what kind of claim you are allowed to build on it.
HyreADU calculation — HyreADU downloaded a primary file and computed the figure. The method lives on the linked study page, and the number on this page is read from the same JSON module the study reads, so the two cannot drift apart. 48 of the 68 figures here are of this kind.
Agency published — an agency printed this number: HCD, the Census Bureau, or a city building department. We cite the table, never an article about the table. 16 figures.
Trade / survey estimate — a survey or an industry estimate. Useful, labeled as what it is, and never restated as a measurement of every ADU in California. 4 figures, and each names the researcher.
The distinction between the second and third labels matters more than it looks. HCD’s permit counts are a statutory reporting obligation on 511 jurisdictions. Freddie Mac’s 1.4 million is a text search of MLS listing descriptions going back to the late 1990s. Both are real work. Only one of them is a count.
The twelve figures most worth knowing
Each of these is expanded, sourced and dated in the tables below, and each links back to the study that produced it. The class label is part of the figure.
The two clocks are separate measurements of consecutive segments and only the sum is a HyreADU cross-study calculation: 162 days + 499 days = 661 days, about 1.8 years in the City of Los Angeles.
Production: permits and completions, 2018–2025
Permits and completions are the backbone series for the entire category. California jurisdictions report building permits and certificates of occupancy to HCD under the Housing Element annual reporting requirement, and Table A2 carries a UNIT_CAT field with an explicit ADU value.
The permit and completion columns are agency-published counts of unique events, deduplicated by tracking identifier; the ratio columns are ours. Full method and the four unusable reporters on the permits-vs-completions study.
| Year | Permit units | Completions | Same-year ratio | Cumulative ratio | ADU share of all HCD permits | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 12,050 | 3,186 | 26.4% | 26.4% | 9.1% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratios |
| 2019 | 12,992 | 5,957 | 45.9% | 36.5% | 10.3% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratios |
| 2020 | 13,116 | 8,065 | 61.5% | 45.1% | 11.2% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratios |
| 2021 | 21,163 | 10,147 | 47.9% | 46.1% | 15.2% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratios |
| 2022 | 26,224 | 14,043 | 53.6% | 48.4% | 18.5% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratios |
| 2023 | 29,309 | 17,676 | 60.3% | 51.4% | 21.1% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratios |
| 2024 | 31,515 | 20,652 | 65.5% | 54.5% | 26.5% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratios |
| 2025 | 32,126 | 22,630 | 70.4% | 57.3% | 26.1% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratios |
Permit and completion counts are agency-published. Every ratio column is a HyreADU calculation from those two counts. Statewide totals: 178,495 permit units, 102,356 completions, 57.3% cumulative. Excluding the four jurisdictions whose completion fields are unusable — Huntington Beach, Saratoga, West Sacramento and Arvin — the figures are 177,426, 102,352 and 57.7%. Retrieved 2026-09-05.
A naive sum by APR reporting year rather than by the date on the permit double-counts 35,237 permit units, 16.5% of a naive 213,732-unit total. Roundups that report "over 200,000 California ADU permits" are usually reporting that artefact.
What happens to a permit after it is issued
The single most misused ADU statistic is a permit count read as a housing count. HCD’s file supports a better question, because a project can be followed from its permit row to its completion row on the jurisdiction’s own tracking identifier.
Among 81,853 matched projects, the median lag from permit to certificate is 1 year. 29.4% are recorded complete in the same calendar year as the permit, 78.9% within one year, 93.9% within two. The distribution has a long right tail: 4,974 matched projects took three years or more.
Follow permit cohorts instead and the picture changes again. The 2018 cohort, with seven years of follow-up, has an observed completion rate of 47.1%; 40.0% were complete by the end of the second year after permit.
The 2022 cohort is at 62.4% with three years of follow-up. Younger cohorts look worse purely because they have had less time, which is why a cohort table is the only fair way to present this and a single "completion rate" headline is not.
Unmatched is not unbuilt. 40.9% of 2018–2023 permit units have no matching completion row. Some of those units are standing and occupied today, with the certificate reported under a different identifier or not reported at all.
We publish the observed match rate, name what it contains, and refuse to convert it into an abandonment statistic.
The one place the underlying question can be seen directly is Los Angeles, where the building department publishes an issue date and a certificate date on the same row: there, 15.3% of the ADU permits issued in 2020 still have no certificate and no permit final, 6.2 years on.
Two very different instruments therefore agree on the shape of the thing: a substantial minority of issued ADU permits do not become finished ADUs on any timescale a homeowner would recognize.
That is the most important sentence on this page, and it is the reason we do not print a permit count as a housing count.
Permit cohorts followed to completion
Each row follows the ADU permit units dated to one year and asks how many have a matching completion row today. Follow-up length differs by row, so the rows are not comparable to one another as performance measures — only as a maturing series.
| Permit year | Follow-up (years) | Permit units | Matched units | Observed rate | Complete by year 2 | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 7 | 12,074 | 5,687 | 47.1% | 40.0% | HyreADU calculation |
| 2019 | 6 | 13,105 | 8,036 | 61.3% | 53.2% | HyreADU calculation |
| 2020 | 5 | 13,075 | 8,138 | 62.2% | 55.7% | HyreADU calculation |
| 2021 | 4 | 21,184 | 12,731 | 60.1% | 53.5% | HyreADU calculation |
| 2022 | 3 | 26,270 | 16,393 | 62.4% | 57.3% | HyreADU calculation |
| 2023 | 2 | 28,943 | 16,722 | 57.8% | 57.8% | HyreADU calculation |
| 2024 | 1 | 31,093 | 14,498 | 46.6% | 46.6% | HyreADU calculation |
| 2025 | 0 | 31,614 | 5,088 | 16.1% | 16.1% | HyreADU calculation |
HyreADU calculation on HCD APR Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05. Matching is on the jurisdiction’s own project identifier; 15,082 ADU rows (5.4%) carry no identifier at all and cannot be matched in either direction. The 2025 row has zero years of follow-up and is printed only so the series is complete.
Full method, the identifier-join limitations and the treatment of the four unusable reporters are on the permits-vs-completions study.
Where the permits are: the twenty largest reporters
ADU production in California is concentrated. The City of Los Angeles alone accounts for 27.8% of every ADU permit unit reported statewide since 2018, and the twenty jurisdictions below account for 53.7% of them between them.
The completion ratio column is a reporting-quality signal as much as a construction signal, and this table is emphatically not a ranking.
| Jurisdiction | County | Permit units | Completions | Completions per permit | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles | Los Angeles | 49,556 | 29,529 | 59.6% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| San Diego | San Diego | 9,153 | 2,667 | 29.1% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Unincorporated Los Angeles County | Los Angeles | 5,657 | 2,903 | 51.3% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Long Beach | Los Angeles | 3,493 | 2,745 | 78.6% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| San José | Santa Clara | 3,337 | 2,104 | 63.1% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Santa Maria | Santa Barbara | 2,554 | 1,677 | 65.7% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Garden Grove | Orange | 2,477 | 1,525 | 61.6% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| San Francisco | San Francisco | 2,353 | 1,673 | 71.1% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Unincorporated San Diego County | San Diego | 2,274 | 1,502 | 66.1% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Oakland | Alameda | 1,891 | 1,221 | 64.6% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Glendale | Los Angeles | 1,777 | 1,309 | 73.7% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Burbank | Los Angeles | 1,762 | 943 | 53.5% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Sacramento | Sacramento | 1,631 | 1,032 | 63.3% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Anaheim | Orange | 1,292 | 802 | 62.1% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Riverside | Riverside | 1,185 | 737 | 62.2% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Unincorporated Santa Barbara County | Santa Barbara | 1,144 | 307 | 26.8% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Santa Ana | Orange | 1,120 | 704 | 62.9% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Chula Vista | San Diego | 1,109 | 551 | 49.7% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Westminster | Orange | 1,037 | 767 | 74.0% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
| Pasadena | Los Angeles | 1,037 | 418 | 40.3% | Agency published counts · HyreADU calculation ratio |
HCD APR Table A2, 2018–2025, retrieved 2026-09-05. Counts are agency-published; the ratio is ours. Four jurisdictions are excluded from every table on this page as unusable reporters — Huntington Beach (495 ADU permits, zero completions ever reported), Saratoga, West Sacramento and Arvin. They are named rather than silently counted as zero production.
A low ratio can mean slow construction, a reporting practice that never fills the completion field, or an identifier that changed. It cannot be read as a jurisdiction’s competence. The permits-vs-completions study sets out the four rules used to classify a reporter as unusable.
The two clocks: approval, then construction
"How long does an ADU take" is two questions with two different datasets behind them. The first clock runs from application to permit issuance and is measurable in three California jurisdictions that publish both dates.
The second runs from issuance to certificate of occupancy and is measurable in exactly one, Los Angeles, which publishes an issue date and a certificate date on the same permit row.
Medians throughout, never means, and the interquartile range beside every median because these distributions are strongly right-skewed.
| Clock | Jurisdiction | Median | IQR | n | Window | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application → issued | City of Los Angeles | 162 days | 79–301 days | 27,188 | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation |
| Filed → issued | City and County of San Francisco | 445 days | 276–707 days | 1,713 | 2015–2026 | HyreADU calculation |
| Received → issued | Marin County (unincorporated) | 175 days | 105–308 days | 472 | 2018–2026 | HyreADU calculation |
| Issued → certificate of occupancy | City of Los Angeles | 499 days | 292–1066 days | 39,278 | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation |
| Issued → certificate, finished permits only | City of Los Angeles | 367 days | 238–563 days | 24,972 | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation |
HyreADU calculations on municipal open data, retrieved 2026-09-05. The issuance-to-certificate median is a Kaplan-Meier estimate that keeps the 14,306 permits which have not completed inside the calculation; the finished-permits-only row is printed beside it because it is the number a builder’s own records would produce, and it is roughly four months shorter for a reason that has nothing to do with building faster.
Neither clock is the statutory 60 days. Government Code § 66317 runs 60 days from a completed application, and none of these extracts marks the completeness determination, so applicant delay, fee payment and back-check cycles all sit inside the median.
A median above 60 days is not by itself a finding that a city missed the shot clock. Full treatment on the permit-times study and the construction-duration study.
Construction time by what is actually being built
The permit type is the closest thing the Los Angeles data has to a construction method. A new-construction permit is a detached ADU built from the ground up; an alteration permit is usually a garage or interior conversion. The gap between them is five months at the median.
| What the permit describes | Median, issued → certificate | IQR | Within 1 year | Within 2 years | n | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New construction (detached ADU) | 564 days | 365–1058 days | 25% | 62% | 10,612 | HyreADU calculation |
| Addition (attached ADU) | 528 days | 325–1121 days | 31% | 63% | 12,227 | HyreADU calculation |
| Alteration/repair (conversion) | 419 days | 230–999 days | 45% | 68% | 16,438 | HyreADU calculation |
| Junior ADU (JADU) | 387 days | 212–908 days | 47% | 70% | 3,778 | HyreADU calculation |
| Standard ADU | 509 days | 301–1086 days | 34% | 65% | 35,500 | HyreADU calculation |
HyreADU calculation on LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05, observation window closing 2026-08-31. Kaplan-Meier medians. City of Los Angeles only.
Junior ADUs finish fastest of all — median 387 days against 509 days for a standard ADU — which is what you would expect of a unit created inside an existing bedroom footprint. See the construction-duration study.
Size: the statute is choosing the number
The floor-area distribution of new detached ADU permits in Los Angeles is not shaped like a distribution of household needs.
It has hard modes sitting on the numbers written into the Government Code, with a cliff immediately above each one. 635 permits declare exactly 1,200 square feet — the statutory ceiling for a detached ADU under Gov. Code § 66314(a)(5) — and 1,061 sit in the last five square feet below it. Only 12.5% go above.
| Measure | Value | What the number is anchored to | Class |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median permitted floor area | 920 sq ft | No statutory anchor — the middle of the distribution | HyreADU calculation |
| 25th percentile | 670 sq ft | Below the 750 sq ft impact-fee threshold | HyreADU calculation |
| 75th percentile | 1,194 sq ft | Six square feet under the 1,200 sq ft ceiling | HyreADU calculation |
| 10th / 90th percentile | 460 / 1,343 sq ft | The tails | HyreADU calculation |
| Permits declaring exactly 1,200 sq ft | 635 | Gov. Code § 66314(a)(5) detached ceiling | HyreADU calculation |
| Permits declaring 1,195–1,200 sq ft | 1,061 | The last five feet under the ceiling | HyreADU calculation |
| Permits declaring exactly 800 sq ft | 254 | The floor a local ordinance may not zone below | HyreADU calculation |
| Share at or under 750 sq ft | 32.5% | Gov. Code § 66311.5 — no impact fee at or below 750 sq ft | HyreADU calculation |
| Share between 750 and 800 sq ft | 10.4% | Immediately above the fee-free threshold | HyreADU calculation |
| Share above 1,200 sq ft | 12.5% | Above the detached ceiling | HyreADU calculation |
HyreADU calculation on 8,536 City of Los Angeles new-construction ADU permits with a declared floor area between 100 and 3,000 sq ft, issued 2020 to 2026-08-30. LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05. Floor area is the department’s field, not a HyreADU measurement.
The policy reading is available and worth stating carefully: a size cap set at 1,200 square feet does not merely constrain the largest units, it creates a cluster at 1,200.
The size-distribution study shows the same shape at 800 and at 750, and treats the two recodifications of the ADU statute since 2024 explicitly — § 65852.2 is stale and should not be cited.
Declared permit valuation, five jurisdictions
Declared permit valuation is the closest thing to a cost figure that exists in public permit data, and it is not a cost figure.
Declared valuation is the value an applicant declared to the building department, typically because fees are calculated from it.
The spread between jurisdictions is large enough that a statewide average would be meaningless, which is why we do not publish one.
| Jurisdiction | Median declared | p25 | p75 | p90 | n permits | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Los Angeles | $40,000 | $20,000 | $81,000 | $125,000 | 3,809 | HyreADU calculation |
| City and County of San Francisco | $150,000 | $83,625 | $250,000 | $403,500 | 1,314 | HyreADU calculation |
| City of Sacramento | $133,105 | $85,000 | $195,313 | $241,150 | 749 | HyreADU calculation |
| City of San José | $98,971 | $71,819 | $131,648 | $167,433 | 459 | HyreADU calculation |
| Marin County (unincorporated) | $156,800 | $55,000 | $350,000 | $659,760 | 277 | HyreADU calculation |
HyreADU calculation on municipal permit harvests taken 29–30 August 2026, computed 2026-09-05. Owner-builder records are excluded. Issued-date windows differ by city and are stated in the ledger. Zero and missing valuations are dropped.
Within Los Angeles the split by ADU type is the more useful cut: garage conversions have a median declared valuation of $27,000 against $80,000 for everything else — a 2.96× difference on the same permit form, in the same city, in the same years.
Declared valuation is not construction cost; see the permit-valuation study for what it omits.
How much of California’s housing is now accessory
Statewide, ADUs went from 9.1% of HCD-reported housing permits in 2018 to 26.5% in 2024. Underneath that state average the jurisdictional spread is roughly ten to one.
The two share columns below answer different questions and are never mixed: one is a share of what a city has permitted, the other a share of what the state told it to plan for.
| Jurisdiction | ADU permits, cycle to date | All units permitted | ADU share of permitted | ADU share of RHNA allocation | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long Beach | 2,571 | 4,931 | 52.1% | 9.7% | HyreADU calculation |
| Unincorporated Los Angeles County | 3,969 | 10,164 | 39.1% | 4.4% | HyreADU calculation |
| Los Angeles | 28,951 | 77,296 | 37.5% | 6.3% | HyreADU calculation |
| Unincorporated San Diego County | 1,617 | 6,176 | 26.2% | 24.1% | HyreADU calculation |
| San Diego | 6,965 | 36,533 | 19.1% | 6.5% | HyreADU calculation |
| Oakland | 405 | 2,535 | 16.0% | 1.5% | HyreADU calculation |
| San José | 1,060 | 7,819 | 13.6% | 1.7% | HyreADU calculation |
| Sacramento | 1,282 | 14,024 | 9.1% | 2.8% | HyreADU calculation |
| San Francisco | 401 | 6,086 | 6.6% | 0.5% | HyreADU calculation |
| Fresno | 188 | 3,415 | 5.5% | 0.5% | HyreADU calculation |
HyreADU join of HCD APR Table A2 to the state’s 6th-cycle RHNA Progress Report, both retrieved 2026-09-05. Cycle start dates run from April 2021 to December 2023 depending on the region, so the two windows do not align exactly and the shares are approximations, labeled as such.
Statewide, 477,627 units of all types have been permitted against an allocation of 2,495,457 across 539 jurisdictions — 19.1%.
An allocation is a planning obligation, not a construction target, and no ADU on this page can be assigned to an income band because Table A2’s ADU rows carry no affordability field.
The production-vs-need study is explicit about that limit; it is the single most consequential error available on this topic.
Why there is no national ADU statistic on this page
What the federal instrument does
The Census Bureau’s Building Permits Survey classifies residential construction into four structure types: single-family houses, two-unit buildings, three- and four-unit buildings, and buildings with five or more units. Accessory is not among them, and no item on the form asks whether a unit is accessory to another.
The signal is then lost twice, in opposite directions. A garage or basement conversion is an alteration under Item 434, which records permits and valuation but carries no housing-unit count — that unit never enters the national units series at all.
A detached new-build ADU does enter it, but as a one-unit building, in the same cell as a four-bedroom spec house.
The errors do not cancel. Conversions are a pure undercount; detached new-builds are an unattributed overcount inside a category routinely used as a proxy for single-family production. The national-permit-data study sets out the mechanics in full.
What the size of the gap looks like
California is the only place the gap can be measured, because it is the only state with an independent ADU permit series. In 2025 HCD-reported single-family-detached plus ADU permits ran 9,145 units above the federal one-unit series for California; in 2018 they ran 925 units below it.
That is a swing of about ten thousand units in a period when California ADU permits went from 11,978 to 31,460, while the federal one-unit line for the state barely moved: 58,831 in 2018, 57,739 in 2025.
The closest thing to a national estimate is Freddie Mac’s July 2020 figure of 1.4 million properties whose MLS listing text matched accessory-unit phrases at some point since the late 1990s. Freddie Mac names both understatement and overstatement bias in its own write-up and makes no adjustment for demolition.
It is a count of properties, not of standing units, and the how-many-ADUs study treats it as the top of an evidence ladder rather than an answer.
A national ADU figure needs a change to the instrument, not a cleverer analysis of the output: an accessory flag on the permit record, plus a unit count on alteration permits that create a dwelling.
Every figure on this page, with its class
The audit table. 68 figures, each with its geography, its date, its provenance class and its source.
This is the list the one-third gate counts: 48 HyreADU calculations, 16 agency-published, 4 trade or survey.
If a number appears anywhere above and is not in this table, that is a defect and we would like to hear about it.
| Statistic | Figure | Geography | Date | Class | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADU building-permit units reported | 178,495 | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018–2025 | Agency published | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 |
| ADU certificates of occupancy reported | 102,356 | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018–2025 | Agency published | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 |
| ADU permit units, 2025 alone | 32,126 | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2025 | Agency published | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 |
| ADU permit units, 2018 alone | 12,050 | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018 | Agency published | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 |
| ADU completions, 2025 alone | 22,630 | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2025 | Agency published | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 |
| Table A2 rows with UNIT_CAT = ADU | 281,321 | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018–2025 | Agency published | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 |
| Jurisdictions reporting at least one ADU permit | 511 | California | 2018–2025 | Agency published | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 |
| California 1-unit permit units, federal series | 57,739 | California | 2025 | Agency published | Census Building Permits Survey, annual 2025 release (14 May 2026) |
| California all-structure permit units, federal series | 103,856 | California | 2025 | Agency published | Census Building Permits Survey, annual 2025 release (14 May 2026) |
| 6th-cycle RHNA allocation, all income bands | 2,495,457 | California, 539 jurisdictions | 6th cycle | Agency published | HCD RHNA Progress Report, 6th cycle, retrieved 2026-09-05 |
| Units of all types permitted, cycle to date | 477,627 | California, 539 jurisdictions | 6th cycle to 2025 | Agency published | HCD RHNA Progress Report, 6th cycle, retrieved 2026-09-05 |
| Cumulative completions per permit | 57.3% | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018–2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| Cumulative completions per permit, excluding four unusable reporters | 57.7% | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018–2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| Same-year completions per permit, 2025 | 70.4% | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| Same-year completions per permit, 2018 | 26.4% | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| Growth in annual ADU permit units, 2018 to 2025 | 2.67× | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018→2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| Permit units double-counted by a naive APR-year sum | 35,237 | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018–2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| Share of a naive APR-year permit total that is double-counted | 16.5% | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018–2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| ADU share of all HCD-reported permits, 2018 | 9.1% | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| ADU share of all HCD-reported permits, 2024 | 26.5% | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2024 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| ADU share of all HCD-reported permits, 2025 | 26.1% | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| Median permit-to-certificate lag among matched projects | 1 year | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018–2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| Matched projects finishing in the permit year | 29.4% | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018–2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| Matched projects finishing within one year | 78.9% | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018–2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| Matched projects finishing within two years | 93.9% | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018–2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| 2018 permit cohort, observed completion rate after 7 years | 47.1% | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2018 cohort | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| 2022 permit cohort, observed completion rate | 62.4% | California, 511 reporting jurisdictions | 2022 cohort | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permits-vs-completions study |
| HCD single-family-detached plus ADU permits over the federal 1-unit series | +9,145 units | California | 2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 against Census Building Permits Survey, annual 2025 release (14 May 2026) · national-permit-data study |
| Same comparison in 2018 | -925 units | California | 2018 | HyreADU calculation | HCD Housing Element APR, Table A2, retrieved 2026-09-05 against Census Building Permits Survey, annual 2025 release (14 May 2026) · national-permit-data study |
| ADU permits in the analysis frame | 39,279 | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | Agency published | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 |
| Census tracts with at least one ADU permit | 1,142 | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | Agency published | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 |
| Share of city ADU permits in the San Fernando Valley | 53.8% | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · geography study |
| Gini coefficient of ADU permits across tracts with at least one | 0.4731 | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · geography study |
| Share of permits in the top quartile of tracts | 57.3% | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · geography study |
| Median permitted floor area, new detached ADU | 920 sq ft | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · size-distribution study |
| Interquartile range of permitted floor area | 670–1,194 sq ft | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · size-distribution study |
| Permits declaring exactly 1,200 sq ft | 635 | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · size-distribution study |
| Permits declaring 1,195–1,200 sq ft | 1,061 | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · size-distribution study |
| Share of new detached ADU permits at or under 750 sq ft | 32.5% | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · size-distribution study |
| Share above 1,200 sq ft | 12.5% | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · size-distribution study |
| Median days, application to permit issuance | 162 days | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS pi9x-tg5x · DataSF i98e-djp9 · Marin mkbn-caye, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permit-times study |
| Interquartile range, application to issuance | 79–301 days | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS pi9x-tg5x · DataSF i98e-djp9 · Marin mkbn-caye, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permit-times study |
| Median days, filed to issued | 445 days | City and County of San Francisco | 2015–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS pi9x-tg5x · DataSF i98e-djp9 · Marin mkbn-caye, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permit-times study |
| Median days, received to issued | 175 days | Marin County (unincorporated) | 2018–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS pi9x-tg5x · DataSF i98e-djp9 · Marin mkbn-caye, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permit-times study |
| Median days, permit issuance to certificate of occupancy | 499 days | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · construction-duration study |
| Same figure computed on finished permits only | 367 days | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · construction-duration study |
| Share reaching a certificate within one year | 35% | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · construction-duration study |
| Share reaching a certificate within two years | 65% | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · construction-duration study |
| 2020-issued ADU permits with no final, 6.2 years on | 15.3% | City of Los Angeles | 2020 cohort | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · construction-duration study |
| Combined median of the two clocks | 661 days | City of Los Angeles | 2020–2026 | HyreADU calculation | LADBS resource pi9x-tg5x, retrieved 2026-09-05 · permit-times study + construction-duration study |
| Median declared permit valuation | $40,000 | City of Los Angeles | 2017–2023 issued | HyreADU calculation | Municipal permit harvests, 29–30 August 2026, computed 2026-09-05 · permit-valuation study |
| Median declared permit valuation | $150,000 | City and County of San Francisco | 2015–2026 issued | HyreADU calculation | Municipal permit harvests, 29–30 August 2026, computed 2026-09-05 · permit-valuation study |
| Median declared permit valuation | $133,105 | City of Sacramento | 2018–2026 issued | HyreADU calculation | Municipal permit harvests, 29–30 August 2026, computed 2026-09-05 · permit-valuation study |
| Median declared permit valuation | $98,971 | City of San José | 2008–2026 issued | HyreADU calculation | Municipal permit harvests, 29–30 August 2026, computed 2026-09-05 · permit-valuation study |
| Median declared permit valuation | $156,800 | Marin County (unincorporated) | 2014–2026 issued | HyreADU calculation | Municipal permit harvests, 29–30 August 2026, computed 2026-09-05 · permit-valuation study |
| Garage-conversion median declared valuation | $27,000 | City of Los Angeles | 2017–2023 issued | HyreADU calculation | Municipal permit harvests, 29–30 August 2026, computed 2026-09-05 · permit-valuation study |
| Non-garage median declared valuation | $80,000 | City of Los Angeles | 2017–2023 issued | HyreADU calculation | Municipal permit harvests, 29–30 August 2026, computed 2026-09-05 · permit-valuation study |
| ADU share of cycle-to-date permitted housing, highest of ten | 52.1% | Long Beach | 6th cycle to 2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD RHNA Progress Report, 6th cycle, retrieved 2026-09-05 · production-vs-need study |
| ADU share of cycle-to-date permitted housing | 37.5% | City of Los Angeles | 6th cycle to 2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD RHNA Progress Report, 6th cycle, retrieved 2026-09-05 · production-vs-need study |
| ADU share of cycle-to-date permitted housing, lowest of ten | 5.5% | Fresno | 6th cycle to 2025 | HyreADU calculation | HCD RHNA Progress Report, 6th cycle, retrieved 2026-09-05 · production-vs-need study |
| Share of the statewide 6th-cycle allocation permitted so far | 19.1% | California, 539 jurisdictions | 6th cycle to 2025 | Agency published | HCD RHNA Progress Report, 6th cycle, retrieved 2026-09-05 |
| Approximate ADU share of cycle-to-date units permitted statewide | 24.9% | California | 2022–2025 against cycle to date | HyreADU calculation | HCD RHNA Progress Report, 6th cycle, retrieved 2026-09-05 · production-vs-need study |
| Structure categories in the federal permit survey, none of them accessory | 4 | United States | 2026 methodology | Agency published | Census Building Permits Survey methodology |
| Housing units recorded when an ADU is made by conversion | 0 | United States | 2026 methodology | Agency published | Census BPS Item 434 carries no units field |
| Properties whose MLS text mentioned an accessory unit since the late 1990s | 1.4 million | United States | July 2020 | Trade / survey estimate | Freddie Mac, Economic & Housing Research Insight, July 2020 |
| New California ADUs generating rental income | 51% | California, 2018–19 owner survey | Apr 2021 | Trade / survey estimate | Chapple, Ganetsos and Lopez, Center for Community Innovation, 22 April 2021 (Terner-reviewed) |
| New California ADUs housing a relative at no cost | 16% | California, 2018–19 owner survey | Apr 2021 | Trade / survey estimate | Chapple, Ganetsos and Lopez, Center for Community Innovation, 22 April 2021 (Terner-reviewed) |
| New California ADUs that are one-bedroom | 61% | California, 2018–19 owner survey | Apr 2021 | Trade / survey estimate | Chapple, Ganetsos and Lopez, Center for Community Innovation, 22 April 2021 (Terner-reviewed) |
Class definitions: HyreADU calculation — HyreADU computed it from a primary file, method on the linked study. Agency published — an agency printed it. Trade / survey estimate — a named survey or industry estimate. All retrieval dates as stated; the HCD, LADBS, DataSF, Marin and RHNA extracts were all taken on 2026-09-05.
ADU figures we will not repeat
Four ADU claims circulate harder than any others in this category, and this page repeats none of them. Each is either unsourceable, or sourceable to something that does not say what it is quoted as saying.
- A national ADU count, or a national "ADUs built last year" figure
No federal statistical agency publishes one, and the instrument that would produce one does not collect the category.
Any round national number you see is either Freddie Mac’s property count with its qualifications stripped off, or a Californian figure scaled by population — which assumes the rest of the country has California’s statute, and it does not. We publish the evidence ladder instead.
- An "average ADU cost" for California or for the country
Declared permit valuations in the five jurisdictions we hold have medians from $40,000 to $156,800 — a 3.9× spread — and declared valuation is not cost in any of them.
Averaging across markets and across conversion versus new-build is how a brochure gets a round number. The honest artefact is a table with a class label on every row.
- "ADUs take three to six months to build"
On 39,278 Los Angeles permits, the censored-aware median from issuance to certificate of occupancy is 499 days, and only 35% reach a certificate inside a year.
The three-to-six-month claim is roughly what you get by taking the median of the permits that have already finished (367 days) and then discounting further.
It is wrong in a specific and predictable direction: it can only see the projects that ended.
- A permit count read as a housing count
178,495 permit units is not 178,495 homes. 102,356 certificates have been reported against them, the 2018 cohort’s observed completion rate after seven years is 47.1%, and 15.3% of the 2020 Los Angeles cohort has no final at all. Both numbers are real. They measure different things and we always print both.
Citing these figures
Journalists, planning staff and researchers are welcome to cite anything on this page. Where possible, link the study rather than the digest — the method, the sensitivity checks and the limitations live there, and a figure travels better with them attached.
Where a figure is labeled HyreADU calculation, attribute it to HyreADU and name the file: "HyreADU analysis of HCD Housing Element Annual Progress Report Table A2, retrieved 5 September 2026", or "HyreADU analysis of LADBS building permits (Socrata pi9x-tg5x)".
Where it is labeled Agency published, cite HCD or the Census Bureau directly; we are repeating them and we would rather you went to the table.
Where it is Trade / survey estimate, cite the named researchers — Chapple, Ganetsos and Lopez for the owner survey, Freddie Mac for the MLS estimate.
Corrections are published on the page with a dated note rather than edited in silently. If a figure here is wrong, or a source has moved, tell us at hello@hyreadu.com and we will say so in public.
Questions
How many ADUs are there in California?
How many ADUs are there in the United States?
What percentage of California housing is ADUs?
How long does it take to get an ADU permit?
How long does it take to build an ADU?
How big is a typical ADU?
What does an ADU cost?
Do most permitted ADUs actually get built?
Which California city permits the most ADUs?
Why are so many of these statistics Californian?
How current are these figures, and when do they change?
Can I reuse these tables?
Written and audited by
HyreADU Research Desk
Primary-source research, data analysis and fact checking
We are a research desk, not a builder. We read the permit extract, the statute, the HCD return or the fee schedule ourselves, and publish each figure with its source and retrieval date.
Where a number cannot be traced to a primary source, we leave it out and say what we could not verify. Our store-based claims cover California only.
- CA
- the only state this desk will make store-based claims about
- 5
- jurisdictions with extracted ADU permit evidence
- 735
- CSLB-verified companies in the California store
- 0
- national claims from a one-state store
How this desk works
- Primary sources only. Permit counts come from the city or county that issued the permit. Production counts come from HCD’s Annual Progress Report. Rents come from HUD or the Census. We do not cite an article that cites a source; we download the source and compute the figure ourselves.
- This is a California site. The company store is 734 California firms and one New Mexico firm. Permit evidence exists for five named jurisdictions: Los Angeles, San Francisco, Sacramento, San José and unincorporated Marin. A number from that store is titled to those places, never to the United States.
- A permit is not a completion, and a license is not an ADU grade. California licenses no ADU classification. Being named on an ADU permit is evidence of engagement in that jurisdiction, not of quality, completion, or work anywhere else. Owner-builder permits are excluded from contractor counts.
- Calculation is labeled as calculation. Figures we derive are never presented as something HCD, HUD, the Census or a city published. Terner Center research is cited as Terner’s, never restated as ours.
- We do not design, permit or build ADUs, and we take no payment for placement, ranking or a favorable mention. Pages that look like rankings are not: they publish public-record counts and let the reader decide.
- Nothing here is legal, tax or financial advice. Zoning, underwriting and appraisal practice vary by jurisdiction, lender and appraiser. The useful next step on a specific lot is the planning counter and a licensed professional.
Data as of HCD APR Table A2 retrieved 2026-09-05 (HCD last updated 4 September 2026); LADBS pi9x-tg5x retrieved 2026-09-05, feed rowsUpdatedAt 2026-08-31; DataSF i98e-djp9 data_as_of 2026-09-04; Marin mkbn-caye rows updated 2026-09-04; RHNA Progress Report retrieved 2026-09-05; Census BPS annual 2025 release 14 May 2026. Authorship on this site is organizational: the analysis belongs to the desk rather than to a named individual, and we do not publish credentials we do not hold.
Our editorial policy sets out how we source, date and correct what we publish.
Sources & retrieval dates
- California HCD — Housing Element Annual Progress Report, Table A2 (APR data by jurisdiction and year) , 922,102 rows, 281,321 with UNIT_CAT = ADU. Permits and completions counted as unique (jurisdiction, project identifier, date) events and assigned to the date on the permit or certificate. HCD last updated 4 September 2026. Retrieved 2026-09-05.
- California HCD — Table A2 download (tablea2.csv) , The file itself, so the analysis can be reproduced rather than taken on trust. Retrieved 2026-09-05.
- California HCD — RHNA Progress Report, 6th cycle , Allocations and cycle-to-date permitted units for 539 jurisdictions. Statewide allocation 2,495,457; 477,627 units permitted to date. Retrieved 2026-09-05.
- LADBS — Building and Safety Building Permits Issued from 2020 to Present (Socrata pi9x-tg5x) , 409,619 rows downloaded. Carries the department’s ADU flag, submitted and issue dates, certificate-of-occupancy date, declared valuation and floor area on the same row. Source of the size, geography, approval-time and construction-time figures for Los Angeles. Retrieved 2026-09-05.
- DataSF — Building Permits (DBI permit tracking extract, i98e-djp9) , 3,268 rows carrying DBI’s own ADU flag; 1,713 unique issued permits with both a filed and an issued date. data_as_of 2026-09-04. Retrieved 2026-09-05.
- Marin County — Building Permit (mkbn-caye) , Unincorporated Marin only. 482 ADU permits kept after dropping trade-only rows, with received and issued dates. Retrieved 2026-09-05.
- U.S. Census Bureau — Building Permits Survey, annual history by state , California column, units. Census Building Permits Survey, annual 2025 release (14 May 2026). Four structure categories, none of them accessory; Item 434 alterations carry no unit count. Retrieved 2026-09-05.
- U.S. Census Bureau — Building Permits Survey methodology , The source of the four-category classification quoted on this page, and of the Item 434 definition. Retrieved 2026-09-05.
- Chapple, Ganetsos and Lopez — “Reaching California’s ADU Potential”, Center for Community Innovation (Terner-reviewed) , 51% of new ADUs generating rental income, 16% housing a relative at no cost, 61% one-bedroom. A survey of 2018–19 California ADU owners, 22 April 2021. Cited as theirs throughout. Retrieved 2026-09-05.
- Freddie Mac — Economic & Housing Research Insight, July 2020 , “A total of 1.4 million distinct single-family properties with accessory dwellings were identified in our final population,” from roughly 600 million MLS transactions since the late 1990s. Properties, not units; two-sided bias named by Freddie Mac. Retrieved 2026-09-05.
- California Government Code § 66314 — ADU development standards , The 1,200 sq ft ceiling on a detached ADU that the Los Angeles floor-area distribution clusters on. The ADU provisions were recodified out of § 65852.2; citing the old section number is a live error in this field. Retrieved 2026-09-05.
- California Government Code § 66311.5 — impact fees on accessory dwelling units , No impact fee may be imposed on an ADU of 750 sq ft or less. The second statutory threshold the size distribution clusters on. Retrieved 2026-09-05.
- California Government Code § 66317 — ADU application processing , The 60-day period to act on a completed ADU application, referenced where this page discusses the approval clock. Retrieved 2026-09-05.
A statistic is not a project
Every figure on this page describes a distribution that has already happened somewhere else. Your parcel has a zone, a slope, a panel and a plan checker. Start from the rules that apply to it.
HyreADU does not design, permit or build accessory dwelling units. These statistics are informational and are not legal, tax, financial or construction advice.
HCD figures describe California; Los Angeles figures describe the City of Los Angeles; neither is a national statistic and neither is scaled into one on this page. Declared permit valuation is not construction cost.
A permit is not a completion, and an unmatched permit is not an abandoned project. Survey figures are attributed to the researchers who produced them and are never restated as measurements of every ADU in California.
Statutory citations reflect the ADU provisions as recodified; verify current section numbers before relying on them.